I recently read the book Quitter, by Jon Acuff. As a book, I give it a B+. While it lacks the “call to action” his brand
is known for, it’s a quick read with some good metaphors that will help the
points stick. In the book, Jon describes
his own journey to attaining his “dream job”.
Prior to landing his ultimate gig, Jon was a serial quitter (in terms of
his career), quitting 8 jobs in 8 years.
He discusses the paradigm that makes this both a positive and a
negative. It’s negative, because job
hopping is frowned upon in our society.
He viewed it as positive because he gained a variety of experiences in a
relatively short time that gave him “practice” for his dream job (not always in
the most direct sense).
While I only mildly relate to Jon’s personal journey, there
is some real insight that comes from his book.
Jon Acuff may be one of the first of his generation to so eloquently put
into words why he was a job hopper. For
the record, I do not think that job hopping is as terrible as the stigma it has
in society. I think there are some
benefits to hiring a job hopper, and the benefits can outweigh to pitfalls (see 5 Reasons to Hire Job Hoppers). However, I’m a logical person and understand
you cannot build your entire workforce out of job hoppers. Your turnover would be highly costly and the
benefits would no longer be worth it.
Plus, in every career, there is occasionally some benefit in sticking
around. The hard part, is actually doing
it.
"I'll give it two weeks. If I don't bring in my first deal
by then, I'll go do something else.”
This individual was trying to cram a three month ramp-up into an
impossible 14-day window.
"I plan on retiring soon. I want to earn as much money as I can in the next five years, and then retire." It seems like this person is setting themselves up for disappointment by sabotaging their career with a plan to scramble up the corporate ladder in an unrealistic way.
"If the sales don’t come in and the job doesn't deliver in the first month, I'll know it's time to start interviewing." It is scary to think this is actually someone’s career “vision”.
"I plan on retiring soon. I want to earn as much money as I can in the next five years, and then retire." It seems like this person is setting themselves up for disappointment by sabotaging their career with a plan to scramble up the corporate ladder in an unrealistic way.
"If the sales don’t come in and the job doesn't deliver in the first month, I'll know it's time to start interviewing." It is scary to think this is actually someone’s career “vision”.
Welcome to 2013 where today’s generation can be summed up
with one word: impatient. To Jon Acuff’s point from his book “Quitter”,
today’s younger workforce is smart, ambitious, and eager to quit whatever it is
they're doing right now to get promoted or make more money somewhere else. Hate your job after one week? Quit and find something better. The logic is that if you move at this speed,
it’s still possible to fail, but it will come quickly so you can move on to the
next thing which might be the opportunity that puts you on the exponential
career trajectory.
Why are we this way?
Well, it’s difficult not to compare ourselves to our friends, who post
to Facebook and Twitter all about their fabulous new jobs, promotions and
exotic vacations. The unrelenting
persistence with which we get these messages makes us re-examine ourselves and
how we define success. Additionally, a
career change is right at our fingertips (or is it?). With the Internet and wide availability of
free information, you can quit your job in the morning, learn to code
throughout the afternoon and read Mark Zuckerburg’s Cinderella story all before
you hit the sack.
Dan Gulati wrote that quitting early and avoiding getting
stuck in a rut can be smart. But continually shortening your time horizons for
career achievement and shirking hard work in the search for immediate silver
bullets is a dangerous practice, and may actually limit your long-term
outcomes.
Dan says, “If you're someone who constantly obsesses about
becoming an overnight success, you're aiming at entirely the wrong target.” A study in the music industry has shown that
music artists whose careers build more gradually are more commercially
successful and have longer career longevity than artists whose careers catapult
to the top overnight. Consider this in
terms of more typical careers. I like to
think of this as the “building” phase.
All careers benefit from enduring a “building” or growth phase. This is similar to the growth phase of a
business. It’s important for the long
term strategy.
Think about this logically.
If you are constantly working on a 2 year horizon until you jump to your
next opportunity, the competition is high.
However, if you lengthen your horizon to 5, 7, 10, or 15 years, you will
be competing against a fraction of people.
It’s the old marathon runner vs. sprinter analogy. There’s certainly something to be said for
working hard and creating value that is enduring. The milestones will be bigger, and the end
result will likely be more meaningful. I encourage you to carefully consider your
career decisions and to be honest with yourself. Employ the right mix of job hopping and slow career
success that will help you reach your goals.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Join the discussion!