Tuesday, October 9, 2012

Great Business Disguised as HR - The 3 Top Characteristics


Self reflection can be difficult.  However, it is important for learning and to move forward – so I make an effort to do it occasionally.  2012 has been a great year for me so far and I've been fortunate to have several great opportunities come my way and fortunate to have the courage to take those opportunities.  Upon a little deeper thinking, I got to look back on an event that I still have mixed feelings about.

I changed jobs this year.  But that’s not what I’m talking about.  Prior to leaving my previous employer, I was being considered for an opportunity outside of HR – and seriously considered the opportunity.  This is a cause of reflection, because the executive who interviewed me for the role stated at one point how surprised she was to find strong strategic talent in HR, and never would have previously considered an HR person for roles that were more operationally based.

This statement has stuck with me because my “insider” view of HR is very different than that of external views.  Now, you might say that I shouldn't be shocked by this view of HR – it’s pretty standard.  However, the views of HR have been steadily changing for years, and I've been fortunate to have been surrounded by strong business people (notice I didn't say HR).

Ultimately, I moved on from that organization and stayed in an HR role.  When I was leaving, my previous manager seemed surprised I was staying in HR because she thought I was “too talented” for an HR role.  This pattern in thought process toward HR may have contributed to my decision to leave that company.  However, I can say I feel more confident in my ability to elevate the HR function knowing that I was seen as too valuable to an organization to be wasted on such work.  I've thought about characteristics that may have shaped that perception and have listed them below.  These are characteristics I aim for because they’re important in any role in any business and should be that much more important in HR.

  1. Know. Your. Business. – Not the HR business, but the business you support.  Know it inside and out and better than anyone else.  Understand why things function the way they do, and why some decisions made have been good, and others not so much.  Understand the struggles of every employee group.  Understand the future plans of your organization, and how all of the puzzle pieces may (or may not) fit into that.  Understand the financials - and the perception of financial health.  In other words, KNOW YOUR STUFF.
  2. Be process driven – even in the entrepreneurial world, where process is often overlooked (intentionally or not intentionally), there are more times than not where it will be appreciated, and lead you to solutions that move your organization (and you) forward.
  3. Get shit done.  Pardon my language, but a colleague once said this to me on a job analysis questionnaire, and I've never heard it put better.  In any part of the organization, leaders and executives like people who get it done.  Now, I’m not saying that values should be compromised to do so, but you understand what I’m saying.  Be the person who makes moves and makes things happen.  Everyone in every department wants that kind of person on their team.

So what is my advice to business owners and leaders looking to beef up their business?  Get great business people in your organization.  Get great business people particularly in HR.  Utilize HR beyond its administrative, cost center function.  How do you do this?  Look for some of the things I mentioned above.  Look for the same things in your HR staff that you would look for in profit and strategy driven functions.   I promise you won’t ever be disappointed with such a decision.

What are your thoughts on this?

Thursday, July 26, 2012

Guest Post - Three Retention Secrets for a High Performance Environment


High performance environments are stressful workplaces, to say the least. When results are king, mediocrity is disdained and failure intolerable. Some employees burn out in the struggle to consistently meet the high expectations typical of these environments. Meanwhile, the individuals who thrive in these environments have intense ambition--and are always on the lookout for greener pastures.

How, then, can high-performing employers reduce turnover, and better retain employees?

The problem may be in the reactive approach companies take when addressing retention. Why not address retention proactively, as a strategic issue? As I see it, there are three things any organization can do to proactively combat turnover.

1. Hire Retainable Employees
The pressure’s on from day one in a high performance environment. While some thrive under pressure, others will falter. By only hiring people who are likely to excel in your organization, you can reduce the chances of this type of casualty.

Work with your managers and top performers to identify what backgrounds, skills or personality characteristics your retainable employees have in common. Then, use this insight to guide your sourcing and screening.

2. Don’t Just Fill Roles - Plan Careers
It’s easy to focus on the near-term when managing people in a high performance environment. You bring in “A Players” with the expectation that they’ll succeed in the role for which you’ve hired them--and unrealistically assume they will stay in that role forever. You need to think bigger.

Career-pathing doesn’t have to be a formal program. The key is to guide your employees in mapping out how they can attain their career goals within your company. Even a rough or incomplete plan is better than no plan at all. Simply having conversations around an employee’s goals shows you care about the employee’s future, which in turn breeds loyalty.

3. Make Retention Personal
Every employee is motivated by different things, and retention strategies thus need to be tailored down to the individual level. Successful organizations don’t view retention initiatives as “one size fits all.” Instead, they’re making retention strategies personal. How? By simply asking, “What motivates you?”

You may be surprised to find that monetary incentives are low on the list of responses you get. These days, “A Players” are more concerned with challenging work, personal and professional growth opportunities, work/life balance, and workplace flexibility.

If money’s the only thing you’re offering employees, don’t be surprised if they look elsewhere for what really matters to them.

What retention strategies have you seen work in a high performance environment? Leave a comment, and join the conversation.


Special thanks to Kyle Lagunas for his contribution of this article to the CatapultHR blog.

About the Author: Kyle Lagunas is the HR Analyst at Software Advice. He blogs about trends, best practices, and technology in HR, talent management, and recruiting. This article originally appeared on his blog: http://blog.softwareadvice.com/articles/hr/5-retention-strategies-for-a-high-performance-environment-1062112/

Monday, May 28, 2012

The ONE Change You Can Make to Better Leverage Your Human Capital & Business Decisions


Happy Memorial Day!  The holiday weekend has allowed me some time to think about HR.  I’ll think about and talk about HR as long as anybody lets me and a topic I’ve been thinking about recently is the difference between an organization that has a partnership with its HR function, and organizations that have a strategic partnership with their HR functions.  What’s the difference?  Do the benefits of one outweigh the benefits of another?  Is one always better than the other?  I recently witnessed the startling difference between the two and it’s been weighing on my mind how such a change can be a pivotal transition for an organization. 

Let’s start by understanding the difference between a partnership and a strategic partnership.  A partnership exists when the business looks to HR for advice to handle its people matters.  Sometimes this is referred to as a business partnership.  The business relies on their legal knowledge and expertise with people issues to manage decisions that have been made and to keep business running smoothly.  A strategic partnership exists when HR is directly involved in the major business decisions of the organization, including the formation of strategy, the design of the organization and the implementation of the business model.

Let’s take an example to understand the difference.  Your organization decides to open a new facility in another state.  Is HR and human capital considered after the decision to open the plant is made or before the decision is made?  A strategic partner is part of the decision making process and has input into the decision rather than helping the business deal with the effects of the decision after it is made.

I’ve had the experience of being part of organizations with both types of relationships with their HR function.  Now, please keep in mind that if anything less than a partnership exists, it’s probable that some facets of the business are being overlooked.  I want to be clear.  I am an advocate of the strategic partnership, although understand and support cases where a business partnership works. 

A business partnership is necessary in most organizations today that want competitive edge.  The vast number of successful organizations have built decent business partnerships with their HR function, and see its value as an internal support system.  This is progress from what this relationship looked like 20+ years ago.  There has been a push, particularly in the last 15+ years for the business to form a strategic partnership with its HR function.  I believe it has become increasingly important as the reality sets in that human capital and how it is organized are increasingly pivotal to organizational effectiveness.  Businesses that have strategic partnerships with their human capital functions are shown to more quickly add and keep shareholder value.  The unfortunate part of this story is that a statistical analysis performed on HR from 1998 to 2007 showed no statistically significant change in HR performing business strategy activities such as identifying/designing strategy options, choosing the best strategy option, planning strategy implementation, identifying new opportunities, or assessing possible merger, acquisition or divestiture strategies.

So how do you utilize your HR function strategically?  There are several ways an HR function can become more strategic.  First, the problem may be in the organizational design of your HR/human capital department.  Organizations whose departments utilize a shared service model, information technology or cross functional training for HR staff are shown to be statistically more strategic than HR departments that are decentralized or organized for resource efficiency.

It’s also important to have strong HR information systems.  Technology can make or break your business, and it can also make or break your people processes.  HR systems are a scaled item, so if you’re smaller, a less robust system may be necessary, but make sure it still gives you the information and competitive advantage your business needs.

We live in the world of analytics today, and HR is no exception to this business trend.  For HR to be strategic, having a fundamental understanding of the metrics that make your “business” successful is crucial.  Three overarching metrics I’ll recommend you have a grasp of are the efficiency, effectiveness and impact of your HR work and initiatives.  There are certain measurements for each of these factors that are important to most businesses.

HR can also improve the decision making process around human capital to be more strategic.  There are several ways HR can do this, but I’ll give you the three shown to statistically contribute the most strategically.
  • HR leaders identify unique strategy insights by connecting human capital issues to business strategy.
  • HR leaders have a good understanding about where and why human capital makes the biggest difference in their business.
  • HR adds value by improving talent decisions inside and outside the HR function.

It would be silly to tell you steps you can take to make HR have a strategic partnership with the business without mentioning that your HR team must have the right skills.  What the right skills are is the million dollar question.  I’m going to give you 5 HR skills shown to have the most impact on creating a strategic partnership.

  • HR Technical Skills
  • Interpersonal Dynamics
  • Business Partner Skills
  • Metrics Skills
  • Managing Outsourcing


Do you or your HR team have a high level of proficiency in these skills?

Overall, the road map for HR becoming more of a strategic partner seems clear both with respect to what it needs to do to be involved in a variety of strategic activities and to become a full strategic partner.  The benefits of a strategic partnership support the argument for such a relationship with business decisions.  However, I realize that there’s a difference between knowing what needs to happen and doing it.  It’s far easier to point to what HR needs to do than to make it happen.  I sometimes see a “stubborn traditionalism” that characterizes the HR profession, which can be a hindrance.  If HR fails to advance, it seems a strategic partnership will remain a goal on most human capital professional’s career checklist.  I encourage you and your business to implement some of the tactics here to start making the transition to a strategic partnership today.

Information and statistics from the Center for Effective Organizations.

Wednesday, April 4, 2012

Rolling With Change – Despite “Impossible” Odds


We’re constantly reminded that the only constant is change and that ideal employees embrace and champion change.  Entrepreneurs are always thinking about what is next in an attempt to stay ahead of change.  I personally have never been in an environment where change was not a daily or weekly encounter.  In fact, change occurs so regularly in my professional life, that I am uncertain if I would be comfortable with stability, which is an ironic statement, and the topic of this post.

I grew up in an age where technology rules and still rules today.  The pace of change in technology has set the tone and pace for everything I know and is the new way of business.  I expect a certain evolution to everything.  If my favorite tablet, e-reader, Smart phone, etc does not have a new edition each year, I feel as though a part of my life is “outdated”.  I look at those products and companies as “behind the times” and surely at risk of losing the technology race. 

As our favorite products and subsequent way of life are always in a state of change, so is the way we work.  It’s expected by employees and employers alike.  However, what are the implications of this expectation?  Can it ever be a disadvantage?  I have a couple thoughts.  

There are times when I do think the pace of change I am accustomed to is not ideal.  When an initiative begins to take hold that I’ve worked to put together, I am quick to doubt it and look for flaws in anticipation of the next iteration.  I know change is inevitable, so I occasionally find my anticipation of change overshadowing my ability to embrace the present.

However, the rate of change, especially in the technology industry is not likely to slow down.  Members of the workforce that find this difficult will need to evolve or get out of the way.  I consider this to be a greater disadvantage.  Often, the difference between an average and high potential employee is the difference between someone who is proactive and reactive to change.  I recommend being proactive.  Being reactive is not only damaging to a person’s long term career goals, but also to the business they support. 

There also comes a point where someone crosses the line from reactive to resistant.  I highly recommend you not be resistant to change.  It will damage your reputation, inhibit your success, and could potentially cost you your job.

Change is ever present and evoking of opinions.  What’s your opinion on this topic?

Wednesday, March 14, 2012

Workforce Planning: An Awesome Opportunity to Enhance & Grow Your Business



Workforce planning is the process an organization uses to analyze its workforce and determine the steps it must take to prepare for future staffing needs.  Great and successful businesses understand the importance of proper workforce planning.  It's time to give your business that same edge.  Keep reading to understand 4 steps to conduct your own workforce planning and give your business a leg up on the competition.

There are several distinct analytical steps that need to betaken in workforce planning:
1. The supply analysis, also referred to asthe “supply model” or “staffing assessment,” involves an analysis of anorganization’s current labor supply.
2. The demand analysis, also referredto as the “demand model,” includes a review of future business plans andobjectives.
3. The gap analysis compares thedifferences in the supply and demand models and identifies skill surpluses anddeficiencies.
4. The solution analysis focuses onhow to address gaps in current staffing and future staffing needs throughrecruiting, training and development, contingent staffing, and outsourcing.

Step 1: Supply analysis
The purpose of the supply model is to analyze theorganization as it currently exists—in other words, the supply of labor andskill sets that are vital to an organization. This analysis should encompassnot only the number of employees and their skills, but also factors such asworkforce demographics, including representation of protected classes.
A supply analysis also involves making projections ofattrition (due to resignations, retirements, internal transfers, promotions andinvoluntary terminations) over the planning horizon being used, so thatattrition is taken into account in considering the future supply of labor andskill. From this information, a profile can be developed of current staff as itwould exist in the future if no action is taken in recruiting, training oroutsourcing.

Step 2: Demand analysis
The purpose of the demand model is to forecast theorganization’s future workforce composition. This forecast should take intoconsideration a range of business issues. These issues may include newproduct lines, competitive forces and expansion/constriction in globalmarketplaces, anticipated workforce availability within geographic boundaries,and a myriad of other issues.
Internal and external factors need to be considered in thedemand analysis. Analyses of internal demand influences may focus on thefollowing questions, among others:
  • Will the current workforce, with minimal retraining, have the skill sets necessary to perform new duties with a new product line?
  • Will current employees remain loyal to the organization that has anticipated changes in mind?
Analyses of external demand influences may consider thesequestions:
  • Is labor readily available that possesses the skills and abilities needed by the evolving organization?
  • What external pressures will change demand for goods and services that may ultimately affect internal business decisions and, thus, workforce planning needs?
The future composition of the workforce must also beanalyzed. This analysis will seek answers to the following questions:
  • How many employees will be necessary to achieve business plan goals and objectives?
  • What skills and competencies will be required for the new business?
  • What is the composition of the available workforce population?
  • What will the organization need to do to attract prospective employees?
  • What will the organization need to do to attract and retain a diverse group of workers?
Step 3: Gap analysis
The next step in the process seeks to compare the supplymodel with the demand model to identify gaps between the composition of thecurrent workforce and future workforce needs. The workforce planningprofessional may want to categorize a variety of future scenarios and thenselect the future that is most likely to occur, with contingency planning foralternative futures. When conducting this analysis, the planner will want toidentify the additional number of employees with requisite skill sets that willbe needed, as well as the employees who will no longer be needed due to limitedskill sets.

Step 4: Solution analysis
Solution analysis involves the development ofstrategies to close the gaps identified in the previous step. Approaches formeeting future workplace demands may include recruiting, training andretraining, utilizing contingent staff, or outsourcing. The approaches selectedwill be dependent upon whether the organization will need to expand, contract,restructure or rely on contingent staff to meet new workplace demands.


Content from SHRM.ORG

Sunday, March 11, 2012

How To Budget for Human Capital Initiatives with 6 Easy Points


The entrepreneur’s or HR professional’s responsibility is to align the HR budget with strategic business goals within organizational guidelines and procedures. Budgeting involves the methodical collection of information and data so that the finances needed to support a business’s objectives can be forecasted. New businesses have no prior financials to use for evaluation; therefore, forecasting and estimating will be needed for the initial HR budget. From an HR perspective, the data needed to generate a new budget includes the following forms of data:

  1. Number of employees projected for the year.
  2. Benefits cost projections.
  3. Projected turnover rate.
  4. Any actual costs already incurred in the current year.
  5. New benefits/programs planned.
  6. Other policies, business strategies, laws or regulations that may affect costs.
Forecasts may be simple or complex and, based on actual costs or projections, depend on the nature of the operating costs and the data available. Managers or business owners preparing an HR budget for the first time will need to collect every source of obtainable data to make knowledgeable projections.


Information taken from SHRM.ORG

Saturday, March 3, 2012

5 People Metrics Every Entrepreneur MUST Understand



The HR function of a business has long been seen as a cost center.  But what happens when you begin measuring people matters and running your HR function more like a profit center?  As your business grows, there are certain people measurements that will enable you to make decisions that effectively and efficiently develop your organization.

1.  Revenue Factor:  total organization revenue/# of full time employees
This is an important factor, especially for small businesses.  As a company looks to grow, be sure to have a firm grip on this number.  You’ll soon realize the benefit to adding sales people or productive staff over administrative and overhead personnel.

2.  Total labor as a percent of operating expenses:  total labor costs/total operating expenses
Understanding how much your labor is costing you is important to look at while beginning and growing your business.  Labor is most likely your largest expense, so it’s important to have a pulse on where your labor costs stand.  Be sure to pay attention to it.

3.  Quality of Hire:  average job performance scores/performance scores for all employees or # new hires promoted within period/all employees promoted within period.
When you’re a small or growing business, the quality of your hire means everything.  Being able to quantify this factor could be key for your business.  Understanding the quality of hire could also help you improve your consistency in hiring high quality candidates if you have complete, historical and detailed information on this topic.  Improving the quality you hire?  Priceless.

4.  Cost per hire:  advertising + headhunters + referral bonus + travel costs + interviewer time + relocation/number of hires
Most great entrepreneurs know that second to a million dollar idea, successful business requires rock star talent.  It’s also commonly known that acquiring this talent can be expensive.  Understanding your cost per hire may better position you to make the strategic hires necessary to move your organization forward.

5.  Turnover:  # of employees terminated/total # of full time employees
This metric is important in every organization, regardless of function, industry, size, etc.  It may be of particular benefit to separate “voluntary turnover” as well as “desirable turnover” from this factor.  This factor can help you better understand many things about your business including morale, culture, labor forecasting, etc.  If you calculate no other HR metric, be sure to know your turnover.

Having and understanding data, and making informed decisions based on data are what moves an organization forward.  Imagine if you could progress your people function above the competition?  Jackpot.  There a variety of other HR metrics an organization can follow (and should follow).  But, we’ll save these for another day and another post.